Sunday, March 7, 2010

An explanation.

Alright, we've taken a break from repairs for the night, we've just finished explaining our problem to Katy. We've also introduced her to the blog. She may or may not decide to comment every now and then, and she'll also be occasionally using Isaac's Twitter.

So the two of them had been studying all day and all night for a couple of days. They'd gotten their hands on some kind of... journal, for lack of a better word. It was from a Slender Man. Well, not quite a full one. One that was moving that way, like thetreeswatch is now.

His speech and writing were very fragmented. He was almost completely insane, from the looks of it. He almost became a total Slender Man before he died. We don't know his name, his identity seems to have vanished with his sanity. In his journal, from the parts we can read, he was fine until one of the Slender Men took interest in him. He talked of a white-suited man at first, and then it got stranger.

He talked of attacks on his house, his friends, and his family. There was a pattern in his entries though. Every twenty days the entry would either look different or be absent completely. When it was present, the writing scrawled all over the page, not paying attention to the margins or directions the sentences went. It was almost like someone was moving the book about while he was writing. Sentences would suddenly curve, change directions, stop suddenly. This is where that whole "power period" thing I'd talked about had occurred. The journal was in horrible shape. Parts of the papers were missing, the back cover was completely missing.

Isaac's calling me into the other room. I'll explain more later.

10 comments:

  1. Best of luck for y'all.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wait. What day was that attack on?

    ReplyDelete
  3. It happened on the 3rd, shortly after I made the post.

    ReplyDelete
  4. That coincides with the twenty days thing you'd talked about.

    ReplyDelete
  5. That's odd. I wrote 2nd, not 3rd. How did it change...?

    ReplyDelete
  6. It didn't change, you just weren't thinking before you posted. Way to go.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The trolling isn't necessary.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Trolls only live under crumbling bridges, so to speak. This bridge is going down.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Seems to be going strong as ever. There's 9 comments to last week's 6.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Two from 'Leo'
    Two from 'Devon,' The writer.
    Three now, from a random troll, myself.
    Two from a random White Knight, the troll scolder, who for some reason, I suspect to be the writer.
    So, even if the white knight's not the writer, that leaves three people actually commenting, one of which is not taking it seriously in the least bit, and is here 'for teh lulz.' If two people is considered 'Strong,' please, give me your definition of what weak is before it's considered nothing.

    ReplyDelete